Appendix 1: Candidate Species

MFish has applied the analytical process to examine all QMS stocks (except paua, rock lobster and bluenose), and to select those suitable for inclusion on the Schedule.

Code

Species

Commentary

Sch. 5?

ANC

Anchovy

Category 1. Substantial investment likely needed to make commercially viable operation, although some scope for a small scale purse seine/ lampara fishery. Therefore possibility of concern at step 5. No concerns at step 4 or 6.

Yes

ANG

Freshwater Eels

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational and customary interest.

No

BAR

Barracouta

Possible fit to category 1. However, considerable bycatch in many fisheries, not all species of which are proposed for the Schedule. Occasionally targeted by established middle and inner shelf trawl fishery. Similar to red cod.

No

BCO

Blue Cod

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational and customary interest.

No

BIG

Bigeye Tuna

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

BUT

Butterfish

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

BWS

Blue Shark

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

BYA

Frilled Venus Shell

Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

BYX

Alfonsino & Long-finned Beryx

Category 1. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Primarily target species. Although a minor bycatch species, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5.

Yes

CDL

Cardinal Fish

Category 1. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5.

Yes

CHC

Red Crab

Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

COC

Cockle

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

DAN

Ringed Dosinia

Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

DSU

Silky Dosinia

Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

ELE

Elephant Fish

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

EMA

Blue Mackerel

Category 1. Although caught by variety of methods (including many low cost such as beach seine), substantial investment to make commercially viable operation in primary method of purse seine and midwater trawl. Step 4, 5: primarily a target, and in bycatch of jack mackerel (which is proposed for Schedule 5). Step 6: there are 89 quota holders, and in addition to the dominant holder there are 3 other quota owners who own more than 10%. Therefore no concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

FLA

Flats

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

FRO

Frostfish

Category 1. Although a bycatch species, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. Very little non-commercial catch. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

GAR

Garfish

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

GLM

Green-lipped Mussel

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

GMU

Grey Mullet

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

GSC

Giant Spider Crab

Category 1, 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

GSH

Ghost Shark

Category 1. Step 4: ghost sharks are common bycatch, but relatively minor, so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. Most of complex is proposed for Schedule. No concerns at step 5 or 6.

Yes

GSP

Pale Ghost Shark

Category 1. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

GUR

Gurnard

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

HAK

Hake

Category 1,3. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

HOK

Hoki

Category 1,3. All major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

HOR

Horse Mussel

Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

HPB

Hapuku & Bass

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

JDO

John Dory

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

JMA

Jack Mackerel

Category 1. Primarily purse seine and trawl. Primarily a target, although some bycatch; all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

KAH

Kahawai

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational species.

No

KIC

King Crab

Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

KIN

Kingfish

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational species.

No

KWH

Knobbed Whelk

Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

LDO

Lookdown Dory

Category 1. Primarily a bycatch (although some target); all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

LEA

Leatherjacket

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3

No

LFE

Long-finned Eel

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3

No

LIN

Ling

Category 1. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

MAK

Mako Shark

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery.

No

MDI

Trough Shell

Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

MMI

Large Trough Shell

Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

MOK

Moki

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

MOO

Moonfish

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery.

No

OEO

Oreos

Category 1, 3. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

ORH

Orange Roughy

Category 1, 3. All major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

OYS

Oysters Dredge

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

OYU

Oysters Dredge

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

PAD

Paddle Crab

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3

No

PAR

Parore

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3

No

PDO

Deepwater Tuatua

Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

PHC

Packhorse Rock Lobster

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3

No

PIL

Pilchard

Category 1. Although caught by variety of methods (including the low cost beach seine), substantial investment to make commercially viable operation in primary method of purse seine. Primarily a target; bycatch in jack mackerel, which is proposed for Schedule 5. Some recreational interest, but seldom targeted. Therefore, no concerns at step 4 or 6. Some scope for a small scale purse seine/ lampara fishery, therefore possibility of concern at step 5.

Yes

POR

Porae

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

POS

Porbeagle Shark

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery.

No

PPI

Pipi

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3.

No

PZL

Deepwater (King) Clam

Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

QSC

Queen Scallop

Category 1. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6.

Yes

RBM

Rays Bream

Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery.

No

RBY Rubyfish Category 1. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Yes
RCO Red Cod Does not fit category 1 or 3. Possible fit to category 2, but not compelling. No
RIB Ribaldo Category 1. Caught as bycatch; all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Yes
RSK Rough Skate Category 1, 3. Step 4: skate is a common bycatch. Although relatively minor, it is caught in most inshore trawl fisheries, so there is some risk that aggregation would limit ACE. Sufficient concern to withhold from Schedule. Step 5: no concern, as most skate is caught in bottom trawls and longliners. Step 6: since RSK is a bycatch in many fisheries, there is likely to be demand for quota. Quota is currently reasonably disaggregated, with 178 owners, of which 6 own more than 5%. No reason to suggest reduction in pool of purchasers. No concern at step 6. No
RSN Red Snapper Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
SAE Triangle Shell Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Yes
SBW Southern Blue Whiting Category 1, 3. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Yes
SCA Scallop Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
SCC Sea Cucumber Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Although fishery is unproven, access does not require investment and export market is well established. No
SCH School Shark Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
SCI Scampi Category 1, 3. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Yes
SFE Short-finned Freshwater Eel Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
SKI Gemfish Category 1. Step 4: bycatch in hoki and squid, both of which are proposed for Schedule, so no concern. Step 5: coastal fish, down to about 550 m, with catch primarily by trawlers. Some recreational catch, but too small to be significant. Therefore some concern but not sufficient to withhold from Schedule. Step 6: 103 quota holders, or which 5 own more than 5% (each) of quota. Top 6 owners control 75% of TACC. Suggests little concern at step 6. Yes
SNA Snapper Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational species. No
SPD Spiny Dogfish Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
SPE Sea Perch Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
SPO Rig Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
SPR Sprats Possible fit to category 1. Although caught by variety of methods (including low cost methods), substantial investment to prove up a commercially viable operation. Some concern at step 5. Crown owns the majority of quota, with few bids at the February 2006 tender round. Therefore no concern at step 4 or 6. Yes
SQU Arrow Squid Category 1, 3. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Yes
SSK Smooth Skate Category 1, 3. Step 4: smooth skate is a common bycatch, but relatively minor, so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. Step 5: no concern, as most skate is caught in bottom trawls and longliners. Step 6: quota is currently reasonably disaggregated, with 190 owners, of which 4 own more than 5%. No reason to suggest reduction in pool of purchasers. Yes
STA Giant Stargazer Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
STN Southern Bluefin Tuna Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
SUR Kina Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
SWA Silver Warehou Category 1. Step 4: common bycatch, but most of complex is proposed for Schedule, so no concern. No concerns at step 5 or 6. Yes
SWO Swordfish Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery. No
TAR Tarakihi Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
TOR Pacific Bluefin Tuna Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
TRE Trevally Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
TRU Trumpeter Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
TUA Tuatua Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
WAR Common (Blue) Warehou Category 1. Step 4: Common inshore trawl bycatch; not all of which are proposed for Schedule 5 so there is risk that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 5 or 6. No
WWA White Warehou Category 1. Common bycatch; all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Yes
YEM Yellow-eyed Mullet Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
YFN Yellowfin Tuna Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. No
Updated : 16 November 2007