Code |
Species |
Commentary |
Sch. 5? |
ANC |
Anchovy |
Category 1. Substantial investment likely needed to make commercially viable operation, although some scope for a small scale purse seine/ lampara fishery. Therefore possibility of concern at step 5. No concerns at step 4 or 6. |
Yes |
ANG |
Freshwater Eels |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational and customary interest. |
No |
BAR |
Barracouta |
Possible fit to category 1. However, considerable bycatch in many fisheries, not all species of which are proposed for the Schedule. Occasionally targeted by established middle and inner shelf trawl fishery. Similar to red cod. |
No |
BCO |
Blue Cod |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational and customary interest. |
No |
BIG |
Bigeye Tuna |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
BUT |
Butterfish |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
BWS |
Blue Shark |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
BYA |
Frilled Venus Shell |
Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
BYX |
Alfonsino & Long-finned Beryx |
Category 1. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Primarily target species. Although a minor bycatch species, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. |
Yes |
CDL |
Cardinal Fish |
Category 1. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. |
Yes |
CHC |
Red Crab |
Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
COC |
Cockle |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
DAN |
Ringed Dosinia |
Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
DSU |
Silky Dosinia |
Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
ELE |
Elephant Fish |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
EMA |
Blue Mackerel |
Category 1. Although caught by variety of methods (including many low cost such as beach seine), substantial investment to make commercially viable operation in primary method of purse seine and midwater trawl. Step 4, 5: primarily a target, and in bycatch of jack mackerel (which is proposed for Schedule 5). Step 6: there are 89 quota holders, and in addition to the dominant holder there are 3 other quota owners who own more than 10%. Therefore no concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
FLA |
Flats |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
FRO |
Frostfish |
Category 1. Although a bycatch species, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. Very little non-commercial catch. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
GAR |
Garfish |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
GLM |
Green-lipped Mussel |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
GMU |
Grey Mullet |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
GSC |
Giant Spider Crab |
Category 1, 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
GSH |
Ghost Shark |
Category 1. Step 4: ghost sharks are common bycatch, but relatively minor, so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. Most of complex is proposed for Schedule. No concerns at step 5 or 6. |
Yes |
GSP |
Pale Ghost Shark |
Category 1. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
GUR |
Gurnard |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
HAK |
Hake |
Category 1,3. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
HOK |
Hoki |
Category 1,3. All major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
HOR |
Horse Mussel |
Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
HPB |
Hapuku & Bass |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
JDO |
John Dory |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
JMA |
Jack Mackerel |
Category 1. Primarily purse seine and trawl. Primarily a target, although some bycatch; all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
KAH |
Kahawai |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational species. |
No |
KIC |
King Crab |
Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
KIN |
Kingfish |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational species. |
No |
KWH |
Knobbed Whelk |
Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
LDO |
Lookdown Dory |
Category 1. Primarily a bycatch (although some target); all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
LEA |
Leatherjacket |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3 |
No |
LFE |
Long-finned Eel |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3 |
No |
LIN |
Ling |
Category 1. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
MAK |
Mako Shark |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery. |
No |
MDI |
Trough Shell |
Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
MMI |
Large Trough Shell |
Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
MOK |
Moki |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
MOO |
Moonfish |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery. |
No |
OEO |
Oreos |
Category 1, 3. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
ORH |
Orange Roughy |
Category 1, 3. All major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
OYS |
Oysters Dredge |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
OYU |
Oysters Dredge |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
PAD |
Paddle Crab |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3 |
No |
PAR |
Parore |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3 |
No |
PDO |
Deepwater Tuatua |
Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
PHC |
Packhorse Rock Lobster |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3 |
No |
PIL |
Pilchard |
Category 1. Although caught by variety of methods (including the low cost beach seine), substantial investment to make commercially viable operation in primary method of purse seine. Primarily a target; bycatch in jack mackerel, which is proposed for Schedule 5. Some recreational interest, but seldom targeted. Therefore, no concerns at step 4 or 6. Some scope for a small scale purse seine/ lampara fishery, therefore possibility of concern at step 5. |
Yes |
POR |
Porae |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
POS |
Porbeagle Shark |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery. |
No |
PPI |
Pipi |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
PZL |
Deepwater (King) Clam |
Category 2. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
QSC |
Queen Scallop |
Category 1. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
RBM |
Rays Bream |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery. |
No |
| RBY |
Rubyfish |
Category 1. Although a bycatch species as well as target, all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
| RCO |
Red Cod |
Does not fit category 1 or 3. Possible fit to category 2, but not compelling. |
No |
| RIB |
Ribaldo |
Category 1. Caught as bycatch; all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
| RSK |
Rough Skate |
Category 1, 3. Step 4: skate is a common bycatch. Although relatively minor, it is caught in most inshore trawl fisheries, so there is some risk that aggregation would limit ACE. Sufficient concern to withhold from Schedule. Step 5: no concern, as most skate is caught in bottom trawls and longliners. Step 6: since RSK is a bycatch in many fisheries, there is likely to be demand for quota. Quota is currently reasonably disaggregated, with 178 owners, of which 6 own more than 5%. No reason to suggest reduction in pool of purchasers. No concern at step 6. |
No |
| RSN |
Red Snapper |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| SAE |
Triangle Shell |
Category 2. Undeveloped sedentary shellfish. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
| SBW |
Southern Blue Whiting |
Category 1, 3. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
| SCA |
Scallop |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| SCC |
Sea Cucumber |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Although fishery is unproven, access does not require investment and export market is well established. |
No |
| SCH |
School Shark |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| SCI |
Scampi |
Category 1, 3. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
| SFE |
Short-finned Freshwater Eel |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| SKI |
Gemfish |
Category 1. Step 4: bycatch in hoki and squid, both of which are proposed for Schedule, so no concern. Step 5: coastal fish, down to about 550 m, with catch primarily by trawlers. Some recreational catch, but too small to be significant. Therefore some concern but not sufficient to withhold from Schedule. Step 6: 103 quota holders, or which 5 own more than 5% (each) of quota. Top 6 owners control 75% of TACC. Suggests little concern at step 6. |
Yes |
| SNA |
Snapper |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Significant recreational species. |
No |
| SPD |
Spiny Dogfish |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| SPE |
Sea Perch |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| SPO |
Rig |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| SPR |
Sprats |
Possible fit to category 1. Although caught by variety of methods (including low cost methods), substantial investment to prove up a commercially viable operation. Some concern at step 5. Crown owns the majority of quota, with few bids at the February 2006 tender round. Therefore no concern at step 4 or 6. |
Yes |
| SQU |
Arrow Squid |
Category 1, 3. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
| SSK |
Smooth Skate |
Category 1, 3. Step 4: smooth skate is a common bycatch, but relatively minor, so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. Step 5: no concern, as most skate is caught in bottom trawls and longliners. Step 6: quota is currently reasonably disaggregated, with 190 owners, of which 4 own more than 5%. No reason to suggest reduction in pool of purchasers. |
Yes |
| STA |
Giant Stargazer |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| STN |
Southern Bluefin Tuna |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| SUR |
Kina |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| SWA |
Silver Warehou |
Category 1. Step 4: common bycatch, but most of complex is proposed for Schedule, so no concern. No concerns at step 5 or 6. |
Yes |
| SWO |
Swordfish |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. Bycatch of tuna fishery. |
No |
| TAR |
Tarakihi |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| TOR |
Pacific Bluefin Tuna |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| TRE |
Trevally |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| TRU |
Trumpeter |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| TUA |
Tuatua |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| WAR |
Common (Blue) Warehou |
Category 1. Step 4: Common inshore trawl bycatch; not all of which are proposed for Schedule 5 so there is risk that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 5 or 6. |
No |
| WWA |
White Warehou |
Category 1. Common bycatch; all major species in complex proposed for Schedule 5 so risk is low that aggregation would limit ACE. No concerns at step 4, 5 or 6. |
Yes |
| YEM |
Yellow-eyed Mullet |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |
| YFN |
Yellowfin Tuna |
Does not fit category 1, 2 or 3. |
No |